&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Oct 10 2008

Go Sarah Go!

Published by smcdavid at 4:29 pm under Politics Edit This

As the media engages in the predictable skeleton search in an attempt to discredit Governor Palin, I have attempted to investigate the multitude of rumors that are taking up an increasingly large amount of air time and column space.

The first is Palin’s alleged attempt to ban books from her local library. I’m not a proponent of book banning. In fact when any institution, or religion for that matter, attempts to ban inquires or knowledge or texts, it’s a clear indication of ulterior motives. Palin has admitted she asked what the process was for banning a book. No one has provided any evidence that Palin did anything more than inquire about a process. I will not hold an inquiry against anyone.

Another rumor that was concerning to me is Palin’s attempt to ban the teaching of evolution from Alaskan schools. Palin is on the record as stating that she believes evolution should be taught in science class. She also has stated that she would not oppose a science class discussing the theory of creationism if a student brought it up in class. I have no problem with this. In fact, I believe the theory of intelligent design is an interesting theory with some scientific basis that merits discussion. Banning the discussion of a theory puts those against discussing intelligent design in the same light as those who want to ban the teaching of evolution. One can’t claim to be open minded yet insist on stifling discussion or debate.

Other interesting statements she has made are that she is against same sex marriage, but believes it is unconstitutional to prohibit individuals from choosing same-sex partners for insurance benefits or hospitalization visitation. She also has made an interesting statement on abortion rights; claiming that abortion in cases of rape is a personal decision, and that she would choose life, which indicates to me that she recognizes abortion is a woman’s choice and not the government’s decision. She has stated she is a “feminist” and believes in equal rights for women.

She is outspoken on her own beliefs on these hotpoint issues, however she has no record that I know of attempting to legislate morality; instead focusing her administration on energy issues and weeding corruption out of our government process. I admit I was disappointed with her interview with Katie Couric. I was angry with the McCain campaign for not preparing her for those questions. But we all have off days. Whether Palin wasn’t prepped, or was distracted during the interview perhaps we’ll never know.

I thought Governor Palin’s performance at the debate with Senator Biden was spectacular. Going up against a long time incumbent is no easy task. The other guy knows details that can’t be learned in a month of campaigning. However Palin had done her research, gave articulate answers, kept her cool and kept Senator Biden on edge. Go Sarah go!

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

6 Responses to “Go Sarah Go!”

  1. skwguitaron 10 Oct 2008 at 5:35 pm edit this

    Good research, but those are all things that have been vetted by multiple sources in the past.

    What about her and her husband’s ties to the AIP?

    Saundra’s Comments: The Alaskan Independence Party Chair has stated that Palin has never been a member.

  2. threedegreeson 10 Oct 2008 at 6:19 pm edit this

    Sarah Palin is a fear mongering demagogue with no respect for either the current position she holds as Governor of Alaska, nor any respect for the second highest office in the land. She goes beyond “pallin’ around with terrorists”; she married one, and is honor bound by her religion to support her husbands beliefs.

    She has a horrible record on women’s issues and the environment, as well as the treatment of animals. Compassionate conservative? Not so much.

    While she was able to mutter coherently enough to spout out her crammed Karl Rove talking points, she was unable to establish a victory in the minds of the undecided voters, who’s opinions were the only ones that counted.

    In a few hours, the first report from Troopergate will be publicly released, though if you check www.ADN.com, you can get a little taste early.

    Saundra’s Comments: Unless you provide specific examples your arguments are meritless and cast you in a light other than an “undecided voter.”

  3. skwguitaron 10 Oct 2008 at 8:19 pm edit this

    she wasn’t, but her husband certainly was.

    Saundra’s Comments: Hmmmm, I thought it was Sarah who was running for Vice President….

  4. skwguitaron 10 Oct 2008 at 11:39 pm edit this

    You should approve threedegrees comment, where he actually did provide links, because that’s what you asked, and it’s kind of weird if you don’t. Just saying.

    Saundra’s Comment: If he cares to have a discussion about it I’ll consider it, but simply posting a bunch of links is not a discussion.

  5. bluesistersredstateon 11 Oct 2008 at 7:56 am edit this

    Lets think real hard. Teaching evolution in a science class……does that make since. Shouldn’t it be taught in theology? Isn’t that like your Spanish teacher insisting that you learn the alphabet in French?

    Saundra’s Comments: I would expect the Spanish teacher to acknowledge that there is another language called French if a student asked about it. I would even be okay with the Spanish teacher taking out a map and taking a few minutes to introduce all of the various foreign languages to the students and then directing those interested in any particular language to the appropriate class if the students were interested in learning more.

  6. eclecticbirdon 11 Oct 2008 at 4:51 pm edit this

    Just so we’re clear I don’t think McCain/Palin are the right choice for our country. BUT I think your Spanish/French analogy is quite good ;o)

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not A Member? Register for Free!

Advertise Here